#3206: BSPs Wiki Page is Out of Date
---------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: Joel Sherrill | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 4.12.0
Component: doc | Version: 4.12
Severity: blocker | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by Chris Johns):
Release [https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/4.11/4.11.2/README.txt
README.txt] files contain a list of BSPs in that release (scroll down). It
is generated automatically using the `rtems-bsp` script when the release
is created.
The current definitive BSP definition is the `rtems-bsp` which learns from
the source tree and:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tester/rtems/rtems-bsps.ini
For me a BSP only formally exists if it is in the INI files under the
`rtems-tester`.
A list of BSPs is nice, a list based on the Tier structure would be nicer
and a list based on the Tier structure with valid test results even
better.
My hope is users of RTEMS will put pressure on those providing services to
them to get their architecture and BSP moved up the tier ranks by
publishing test results on `[email protected]`.
There is also Amar's django [https://www-new.rtems.org/bsp/ website] that
has support for managing BSPs however that effort needs work to straighten
out some schema issues on the relationship of arch, processors and BSP
that resulted from Amar and I talking at cross purposes. I am not sure
what is involved and how much work is required to make this production
quality. I am also not sure how we maintain this data long term if this
database become active.
--
Ticket URL: <http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3206#comment:1>
RTEMS Project <http://www.rtems.org/>
RTEMS Project
_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
