#4037: Python script distribution standardisation -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: Chris Johns | Owner: (none) Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.1 Component: admin | Version: 6 Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by Christian Mauderer): > > The last point is definitively a controversial one. There are good reasons for both directions. But again: Maybe that should be discussed with a broader audience? > > I think there will be some push back to dropping Python2 right now and this will fade as time goes on. There would be some advantages too. Maybe we should discuss an indicator that it is time to drop the python2 support (for example: as soon as waf does; or as soon as CentOS doesn't installs it by default; or in 1 year; or ...) so that there is a clear plan and it isn't discussed again and again every few months. But like you said: That's not the topic of this ticket and I think it would be better to discuss this on the mailing list. -- Ticket URL: <http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4037#comment:17> RTEMS Project <http://www.rtems.org/> RTEMS Project
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs