#4675: sleep should be a thread cancellation point ------------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: Alexandre Oliva | Owner: (none) Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: admin | Version: 6 Severity: normal | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ------------------------------+-------------------- GCC has worked around, in the libstdc++ testsuite, the fact that nanosleep (as well as sleep and clock_nanosleep) should be thread cancellation points, per POSIX, but RTEMS may want to make them so. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597003.html
(I haven't checked that other functions that should be thread cancellation points are, I only noticed that this one wasn't, and decided to file this ticket because for other issues in which I explicitly identified RTEMS I got a request to do so) -- Ticket URL: <http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4675> RTEMS Project <http://www.rtems.org/> RTEMS Project
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs