Loris Nardo created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5070
## Summary The testcase regarding the `rename` with `LINK_MAX` assumes that every file (folder in that case) counts a link towards the parent folder, and thus moving one more folder from outside into the parent folder fails with `ENOLINK`. FAT, RFS, JFFS2 and IMFS however seem to not care about the parent link to the folder. For what I can see in the code, only the IMFS file system can yield back `ENOLINK` from `IMFS_link`. In addition FAT, RFS and JFFS2 do not set a different value for `LINK_MAX` during mounting, causing the value of `LINK_MAX` to be always 5 (the default) for these file systems. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5070 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
