Hesham Almatary commented on a discussion on bsps/riscv/shared/start/bspgetworkarea.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/194#note_111861 > int ac; > int sc; > int len; > + uint64_t start64; > + uint64_t size64; > + uint64_t start32; > + uint64_t size32; Also E51 is a monitor/boot core. This MR is mainly targeting and tested for the `U54-MC` processor that I assume does handle unaligned accesses fine? The question of whether to support E51 (and how) is another issue we could address later (but I assume it's just a matter of changing the CPU_FLAGS to build for RV64IMAC and with the mentioned `mstrict-align`) -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/194#note_111861 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
