Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on testsuites/psxtests/psxsignal10/init.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/868#note_137026 > + rtems_test_assert( !status ); > + status = sigdelset( &all_masked, SIGILL ); > + rtems_test_assert( !status ); > + > + memset( &fault_act, 0, sizeof( fault_act ) ); > + fault_act.sa_handler = fault_handler; > + fault_act.sa_mask = all_masked; > + > + status = sigprocmask( SIG_SETMASK, &fault_act.sa_mask, &oset ); > + rtems_test_assert( !status ); > + status = sigaction( SIGILL, &fault_act, &fault_oact ); > + rtems_test_assert( !status ); > + > + if ( sigsetjmp( fault_jmp, 1 ) == 0 ) { > + /* Generate machine exception */ > + _CPU_Instruction_illegal(); Will this test fail on many BSPs? This requires having an exception handler do the right thing. I don't think that's universally the case. @kinsey? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/868#note_137026 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
