Nithilan Rameshkumar commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5409#note_139893 Hi, I'm interested in working on this issue. I've looked through the code and understand the goal: refactor `Stack_checker_Reporter_handler` to take a single `rtems_stack_checker_info` pointer instead of exposing `Thread_Control`/`rtems_tcb`. **My approach:** 1. Extend `rtems_stack_checker_info` with a `pattern_ok` field 2. Update `Stack_checker_Reporter_handler` typedef and built-in reporters 3. Add a helper in `check.c` to populate the info struct before calling the reporter 4. Update the `stackchk03` test's custom reporter **Question:** Should this be a breaking change, or is a deprecation period needed for the old signature? Please let me know if this looks correct and I will proceed with the draft MR. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5409#note_139893 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
