Ning Yang commented on a discussion on bsps/aarch64/rk3399/include/bsp.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/894#note_139901 > + * @name RK3399 UARTs > + * > + * @{ > + */ > +#define RK3399_UART_BASE 0xff180000 > +#define RK3399_UART_SIZE 0x40000 > +#define RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE 0x10000 > + > +#define RK3399_UART0_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x00000) > +#define RK3399_UART0_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE > +#define RK3399_UART1_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x10000) > +#define RK3399_UART1_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE > +#define RK3399_UART2_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x20000) > +#define RK3399_UART2_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE > +#define RK3399_UART3_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x30000) > +#define RK3399_UART3_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE {{image.png}} Yes. Sorry about that. I checked it again and found that UART4 was not in a consecutive position. I hadn't found it. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/894#note_139901 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
