Joel Sherrill commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1053#note_142153 I think this is OK although I suspect there is a solid argument for considering this a false positive. By your own analysis, SCHED_FIFO is the default and there does not appear to be a path through or around the switch which does not set _spolocy_. Thoughts on marking this false positive after scan.coverity.com is back? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1053#note_142153 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
