Gedare Bloom commented on a discussion on cpukit/include/rtems/error.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1069#note_143204 > + * Define Error Flags > + */ > +#define RTEMS_ERROR_BITS (sizeof(rtems_error_code_t) * CHAR_BIT) > + > +#define RTEMS_ERROR_ERRNO (((rtems_error_code_t)1) << (RTEMS_ERROR_BITS - > 2)) > + > +#define RTEMS_ERROR_PANIC (((rtems_error_code_t)1) << (RTEMS_ERROR_BITS - > 3)) > + > +#define RTEMS_ERROR_ABORT (((rtems_error_code_t)1) << (RTEMS_ERROR_BITS - > 4)) > + > +#define RTEMS_ERROR_MASK (RTEMS_ERROR_ERRNO | RTEMS_ERROR_PANIC | > RTEMS_ERROR_ABORT) > > -#define RTEMS_ERROR_MASK \ > - (RTEMS_ERROR_ERRNO | RTEMS_ERROR_ABORT | RTEMS_ERROR_PANIC) /* all */ > +_Static_assert(RTEMS_ERROR_BITS >= 8, > + "rtems_error_code_t too small for error flags"); Yes, remove it. It's a safe assumption nowadays that `CHAR_BIT >= 8` and `sizeof(x) >= 1`, so this assert would never fail. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1069#note_143204 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
