Wayne Thornton commented on a discussion on cpukit/include/rtems/age_verify.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1137#note_145717 > + > +#include <rtems.h> > + > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +extern "C" { > +#endif > + > +// These age brackets are arbitrary and can be changed as needed to comply > with the law of different regions. > +// Ultimately, I think that we could even just have a single "over 18" > bracket, but this allows for a little more > +// granularity if desired. Changes to the rtems_age_set_bracket logic in > age_verify.c would be needed if this occurs. > +typedef enum { > + AGE_UNDER_13 = 0, > + AGE_13_TO_18 = 1, > + AGE_18_TO_24 = 2, > + AGE_OVER_24 = 3 > +} rtems_age_bracket; I agree. My understanding is the bare minimum is "under 13" "13-18" "18+" but I have seen some other discussions where the "18 to 24" is included so I included that here as well. My guess at this time until someone actually challenges this in court would be these four brackets meet the bare minimum in every jurisdiction. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1137#note_145717 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
