Samuel Viegas commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1078#note_149972 Ok, thank you for your input. So, by not allowing raising interrupts above vector 15 could the dangerous code just be substituted with a return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED, or should the else be removed completely? Regarding the tests, since the goal is just to keep the branch coverage at 100%, would a simple loop iterating from vector 16 to 31 be sufficient? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1078#note_149972 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
