Gedare Bloom commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1389#note_156691 Yes we don't need to bloat our testsuite for already covered behaviors. I think this is a nice step of progress for you toward development of the OSAL for TinyUSB, but it might not end up being necessary for us to merge it. I'm also reminded of the ongoing discussion related to the Scrutiny debugger, see https://users.rtems.org/t/specifics-on-the-integration-of-scrutiny-as-a-package/894/5 Working through how to properly integrate TinyUSB into RTEMS is probably the guiding factor to what should be submitted through MR process. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1389#note_156691 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/5-6bjmlpm5r0g5wywb9sxbeoycg-1d/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
