Matteo Concas started a new discussion on bsps/riscv/shared/irq/irq.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1536#note_160945

 >  
 >    interrupt_count = riscv_plic_get_interrupt_count();
 >  
 > +#ifdef RISCV_PLIC_PROBE_PRIORITY_BITS
 > +  /*
 > +   * A PLIC has at least one interrupt source.  The register keeps only the
 > +   * implemented bits.  The priority of the source is set by
 > +   * riscv_plic_cpu_0_init() below.
 > +   */
 > +  plic->priority[1] = UINT32_MAX;
 > +  riscv_plic_maximum_priority = plic->priority[1];

Should `plic->priority[1]` be set back to its original value here?

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1536#note_160945
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. 
Unsubscribe from this thread: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/namespace/49/sent_notifications/6-2kdqn42psx8kcudbfr8uk8qn9-1d/unsubscribe
 | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | 
Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to