On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:15:28AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ReiserFS 3.6.24 (kernel 2.4.0ac4) doesn't seem vulnerable to this attack.
> No segfault, no kernel oops and proper operations.
A few users who have tested this on 2.4 did indeed not reproduce this problem
but got a number of log messages when creating directories with long names
that indicate bugs in the data structures.
Quite a efw people now have found ways to create directories that do not
show up in ls or find output (without any errors), but this might be a
weird bug in ls and find.
(Anyway, the precise discussion can be found on the reiserfs list)
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiserfs ... Vladimir V. Saveliev
- Re: [reiserfs-list] major security bug in reiserfs ... John Morrison
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect SuSE... Christian Zuckschwerdt
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect... Ryan Russell
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may af... Christian Zuckschwerdt
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect... Felix von Leitner
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect SuSE... Gigi Sullivan
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect SuSE... Andreas Ferber
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect... Mark Glines
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect... Jack Coates
- Trend Micro's VirusWall: Multiple vunerabilities Marc Lehmann
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect SuSE... Marc Lehmann
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect SuSE... Ben Greenbaum
- Re: major security bug in reiserfs (may affect... Thomas Mangin
