> > styx@SuxOS-devel:~$ man -l %n%n%n%n > > man: Segmentation fault > > styx@SuxOS-devel:~$ > > > > This was on my Debian 2.2 potato system (It doesn't dump core though). > Just for the record: > on a lot of systems (including Debian), 'man' is not suid/sgid anything, and > this doesn't impose a security problem. > I don't know about Suse/Redhat/others. SuSE ships the /usr/bin/man command suid man. After exploiting the man command format string vulnerability, the attacker can then replace the /usr/bin/man binary with an own program - since the man command is supposed to be used frequently (especially for administrators), this imposes a rather high security risk, which deserves some due respect. We'll provide update packages shortly. > Greets, > Robert Roman. -- - - | Roman Drahtmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // "Caution: Cape does | SuSE GmbH - Security Phone: // not enable user to fly." | Nürnberg, Germany +49-911-740530 // (Batman Costume warning label) | - -
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Robert van der Meulen
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Ethan Benson
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... John
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Megyer Ur
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package forma... Foldi Tamas
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Andreas Ferber
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Graham Hughes
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Matt Zimmerman
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Mate Wierdl
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string... Roman Drahtmueller
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format st... Kris Kennaway
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vulnerab... Darren Moffat
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Seth Arnold
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... Dan Harkless
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vul... David Luyer
- Re: SuSe / Debian man package format string vulnerab... Darren Moffat