>
Sounds rather apocalyptic, but please show me a serious attack code fit in the barely
160 characters of an SMS message. Or maybe technology have suddenly evolved where the
sun shines earlier than here :)
>
Maybe it�s apocalyptic, but
<xMETA HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh"x CONTENT="0;URL=http://www.cr4sh.com"x>
is all you need and it�s not 160 characters (the x�s should be excluded).
Sure, this is not a serious attack code, but if you�re
redirected to a website with a malicious code on it the above code could be used as a
attack code.
>
OTOH, as long as ONE service provider is involved here, shouldn't you be working with
it to fix a incipient form of attack instead of waving flags on public list in order
to generate panic and to eventually
get kudos ?
>
Yes it�s only one service provider, just like Hotmail.
Why didn�t I contact mtnsms? I did, and their reply was: "Why did you send us this
letter?". They are not, as I see it, interested in a fix. So why not inform about this
and maybe notify people working whis this kind of services?
/Thomas
--
url: www.freespeech.org/screams
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUAOj+s0Epl7KAh2d9BEQK9pwCf
Qt7re02wzZxcGJPyqQyWWQAFnPMAn2yf
EdhkgV7kgJXEXPomwWapRj4K=No9l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
