Casper Dik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure why all of the Solaris mail programs are actually set-gid > mail. > > If you strip set-gid mail from /usr/bin/mail,, /usr/bin/mailx, > /usr/SUNWale/bin/mailx, /usr/dt/bin/dtmail, /usr/dt/bin/dtmailpr, > /usr/openwin/bin/mailtool nothing should break. > > (At least not if you /var/mail directory has the standard 1777 permissions) > > By forcing a file permission of 600 on mailboxes, group mail should not > gain you anything. Just how do you force 0600 on mailboxes which don't exist (many MUAs remove empty mailboxes?) Since you cannot easily do this, at the very least a malicious user should be able to steal other users' mail. I think. -- Andrew Hilborne
- Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Pablo Sor
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Casper Dik
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Johann Klasek
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Greg A. Woods
- MUAs that delete spoolfiles (was Solaris /usr/bi... Andrew Hilborne
- MUAs that delete spoolfiles (was Solaris /us... Rich Lafferty
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Dan Astoorian
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Greg A. Woods
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Tobias J. Kreidl
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Greg A. Woods
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPARC) Casper Dik
- Re: Solaris /usr/bin/mailx exploit (SPAR... Greg A. Woods
- Mail delivery privileges (was: Sola... Wietse Venema
- Re: Mail delivery privileges (w... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Mail delivery privilege... Peter W