Aside from using rand, which ain't worth much, perhaps it would be better to actually supply 64 chars for what's supposed to be a 64-byte array. You might even copy the "real" base64 encoding array, which is (A..Z,a..z,0..9,+,/). Barney Wolff On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 04:27:36PM -0700, Tyler Walden wrote: > local(@itoa64) = ( 0 .. 9, a .. z, A .. Z ); # 0 .. 63 # to64
- Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme vulnerab... Peter Ajamian
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme... aleph1
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Sc... Tyler Walden
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authenticatio... Barney Wolff
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme... Chris Adams
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme... Len Sassaman
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme... Peter W
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Sc... Peter Ajamian
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Sc... Wichert Akkerman
- Re: Network Solutions Crypt-PW Authentication-Scheme... jkohl
