On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:48:18PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually, it is *quite* legal to reply a '250 OK' on something that > will eventually
the patch (qmail-1.03-jms1-antispam.patch) replies with 250, even though it already knows that the message will _not_ reach the recipient and will _not_ be bounced. It knows that the message is being sent to /dev/null. Sorry for being unclear. Regards, Uwe
