On 11/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out JP, it does in fact look confusing. We
determined during the Digital Vaccine filter creation process that a
previously released filter was robust enough to block the attack without
further modification and the vendor was immeditately notified.


NP,

I would clarify that in future notifications. i.e.: "tippingpoint
customers have been
protected from attacks of this kind since xyz date by GenericFilterX". Then
you could list the time lines for discovered/acquired, vendor
notification, patch released from vendor, and finally; public
disclosure.

-JP

Reply via email to