Hi,
On 23 Nov 2007 07:23:05 -0000, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was trying to confirm that, but under Windows XP MCE (lang: German and > English) with all patches, overflows on other address. Can anybody confirm > that? I've tested it on VPC with Windows XP SP2 PL and I can confirm it works as the author stated. > I agree with JohnDo, why just don't send user a specially crafted > kernel32.dll :). I don't. First, it's a .txt file, not a .dll file. Second, this file is a part of emoticon sets. You do not expect emoticons to execute some code do you ? ;> > 2. Why did you wrote VERY HIGH threat? This is local buffer overflow. > Moreover user has to > replace original file. This vulnerability has more to do with SE :(. As far as I know the user does not have to overwrite any file. See http://vexillium.org for a video of exploitation without replacing any files. "Very High" might be a little to much, but just a little imho ;> Best Regards ;> -- gynvael.coldwind//vx
