OK... Using a private drop of Ivan's freetype build, with an "SVN update" of
the source base, I get this:
CYGWIN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/make
$ make sanity
make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/tools/fre
etypecheck'
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 13.10.3077 for 80x86
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1984-2002. All rights reserved.
freetypecheck.c
freetypecheck.c(42) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
'QUO
TEME'
freetypecheck.c(42) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
freetypecheck.c(45) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
'QUO
TEME'
freetypecheck.c(45) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '&'
freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before '&'
freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2059: syntax error : '&'
freetypecheck.c(49) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : ','
freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '&'
freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before '&'
freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : '&'
freetypecheck.c(50) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : ','
freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before
'string'
freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before
'string'
freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : '<Unknown>'
freetypecheck.c(51) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before
'string'
freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2143: syntax error : missing '{' before
'string'
freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2059: syntax error : '<Unknown>'
freetypecheck.c(53) : error C2059: syntax error : ')'
freetypecheck.c(54) : error C2059: syntax error : 'if'
freetypecheck.c(54) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
'QUO
TEME'
freetypecheck.c(58) : error C2059: syntax error : 'return'
freetypecheck.c(59) : error C2059: syntax error : '}'
make[2]: ***
[c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/tmp/freetype_version
check] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make/tools/free
typecheck'
make[1]: [sane-freetype] Error 2 (ignored)
/bin/sh:
c:/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/control/build/WINDOW~1/tmp/freetype_versioncheck
.exe: No such file or directory
make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/openjdk/j2se/make'
Somebody have an idea what's going on here? (Obviously, freetypecheck.c
isn't building, but I'm not sure why, beyond the obvious "there's a macro
without enough parameters" as declared on line 42....)
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:build-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Nekrestyanov
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:39 PM
> To: Dan Fabulich
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Anthony Petrov; Phil Race; build-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: encumbrances update
>
>
> >> My tests are not "ideal" for number of reasons:
> >> 2) I was using binary plugs created from my personal workspace.
> >> I believe they should be the same as those to be published with
> >> b17 code drop but this is my assumption.
> >
> > We know for certain that this assumption is FALSE. No binary plug
> > given to the public has ever built successfully on Windows; since your
> > personal plugs have been working for you for months, we can conclude
> > that there's something critically different between your plugs and the
> > plugs we get.
> Prior to introduction of the "binary plugs" in the makefile (starting
> from the b16)
> it was easy to use our internal product builds to import encumbered bits
> for openjdk build.
> So, internal openjdk builds were easier.
>
> However, since b16 we need to export image of binary plugs from the
> product build and
> use these exported images for openjdk build.
> I think (but i am not 100% sure) that same procedure is used to export
> binary plug bits for people outside of @sun.com.
> So now there is fewer chance to have discrepancies (and after all
> t2k.lib is not needed anymore :) ).
> > But who knows? Maybe we'll get lucky this time. :-)
> I can hardly wait to get feedback on build status.
> Hopefully this will be success report :)
> >> BTW, for windows build you will need to build freetype.dll (i tried
> >> only dll built with visualc). I believe that freetype build system
> >> does not generate .dll on windows and therefore some manual tweaking
> >> of freetype makefiles (and sources) might be necessary.
> >
> > Sounds like fun! :-) Will the documentation include a patch? Or just
> > some tips on how to make a .DLL? What source files needed to change?
> No, there is no patch or detailed instruction in the openjdk docs.
>
> You can follow "official" freetype approach -
> http://freetype.freedesktop.org/wiki/FreeType_DLL.
> I believe it worked for me to prepare 32 bit binary.
> Perhaps someday they will finally simplify it and we can just run make :)
>
> In addition to described changes you may also want to tweak ftoptions.h
> to enable subpixel rendering.
>
> -igor
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
> 2:22 PM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 8/2/2007
2:22 PM
