Something strange is going on. When I build from the top-level directory, it fails to build java/hpi. When I build just one level down, using Kelly's "make all ..." syntax below, it builds fine. Hate to say it, but I think this may be a bug in the Makefiles, though I'm not sure where or why...?
Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:build-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Neward > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'build-dev'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Build problem (Windows, b24) > > OK, trying to get back into this. > > (*) FWICT, ALT_OUTPUTDIR doesn't seem to "take" when set from the > command > shell as an environment variable. Is this supposed to work? > (*) When I do cd jdk/make/java/hpi && make VARIANT=DBG FASTDEBUG=true, > I get > nothing. No build, no error, just... enters windows, leaves windows, > done. > > I'm doing a full build (from the top) into a log file for attachment to > this > thread now, will email it when it's done. Problem is, I can't tell if > it's > an environment issue, or a genuine bug in the makefiles, or a PEBKAC > problem. Suggestions welcome.... > > Ted Neward > Java, .NET, XML Services > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:58 AM > > To: Ted Neward > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'build-dev' > > Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24) > > > > > > Do to history, a build directly from the jdk/make directories uses a > > default > > OUTPUTDIR of jdk/build/* but if FASTDEBUG=true, it's jdk/build/*- > > fastdebug, > > or if a plain debug build with just VARIANT=DBG it would be > > jdk/build/*-debug > > The variant builds leave results in a completely separate outputdir. > > > > If you used the very top level makefile (which came from the now > > defunct control/make area) > > the default OUTPUTDIR is ./build/* (at the very top of the > > repositories). > > When this top level Makefile runs the jdk/make Makefiles, it passes > in > > a ALT_OUTPUTDIR > > to refer to this top level build result area because it's default > > outputdir > > is not the same place. > > > > I don't know the complete history as to why this was done this way, > but > > my > > tendency is to try and get us back to a single default OUTPUTDIR for > > all the > > repositories. Someday... > > > > This is what I do when I work on just the jdk repository: > > cd jdk/make && gnumake > > That primes the outputdir area, then I can drop down in: > > cd jdk/make/java && gnumake > > Or even drop in and clean an area and re-build it: > > cd jdk/make/jpda && gnumake clean && gnumake > > Or just repeat the entire build (incremental build) > > cd jdk/make && gnumake > > If I wanted the jdk image (j2sdk-image), I would need to: > > cd jdk/make && gnumake image > > > > But the output by default will go to jdk/build/* > > and a different directory if VARIANT=DBG or FASTDEBUG=true. > > > > I think you need to: > > cd jdk/make && gnumake VARIANT=DBG FASTDEBUG=true > > Then see if you can: > > cd jdk/make/java/hpi && gnumake VARIANT=DBG FASTDEBUG=true > > > > -kto > > > > Ted Neward wrote: > > > Tim-- > > > > > >> Maybe you came in too low and clipped the treetops. > > >> > > > I thought part of the idea would be that if I've just made a change > > to one > > > part of the tree, I don't have to rebuild the whole tree, so I > would > > think > > > coming in lower to the ground would be supported...? > > > > > > Let's turn it around this way: what is Sun doing among the various > > teams? If > > > a developer makes a change, say, to the java.lang.instrument > package, > > what's > > > the quickest way to get his build, presuming that he hasn't changed > > anything > > > outside of that directory? I don't want to be swimming upstream, > but > > in this > > > case, I really don't know which way the water flows. :-) > > > > > >> Try your 'make all' from > [...]/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make > > >> > > > Will do; by the way, what targets are supported in these lower- > level > > makes? > > > "fastdebug" and "fastdebug_build" didn't take, AFAICT (no target). > > > > > >> The first thing the jdk7/jdk build does (after the sanity check) > is > > >> create a number of tools > > >> that will be used later. If you start building lower down in > > >> jdk/make/java there may be an > > >> assumption about work that has already been done. > > >> > > > I can see that, and they are there--they built successfully. What I > > don't > > > understand is why the "treetop build" I tried was looking for them > in > > > windows-i586 and not windows-i586-fastdebug. > > > > > >> This is not automatic because we don't want to fill up someone's > > disk > > >> space with log files. > > >> Not so much of a problem these days, but back in the early days it > > was. > > >> > > > Maybe an option flag/env var in the make set, a la > ALT_LOGFILES=false > > to > > > turn them off or something? It's just a common thing to have the > > build tool > > > logging this stuff these days, it seems. > > > > > > Ted Neward > > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:12 AM > > >> To: Ted Neward > > >> Cc: 'build-dev' > > >> Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24) > > >> > > >> Hi - > > >> > > >>> OpenJDK:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java > > >>> $ make all > > >> Maybe you came in too low and clipped the treetops. > > >> > > >> Try your 'make all' from > [...]/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make > > >> > > >> The first thing the jdk7/jdk build does (after the sanity check) > is > > >> create a number of tools > > >> that will be used later. If you start building lower down in > > >> jdk/make/java there may be an > > >> assumption about work that has already been done. > > >> > > >> So try it again from [...]/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make > > >> > > >> BTW - I always save the build log, as Kelly wrote: > > >> > > >>> make |& tee build.log or make >& build.log > > >> This is not automatic because we don't want to fill up someone's > > disk > > >> space with log files. > > >> Not so much of a problem these days, but back in the early days it > > was. > > >> > > >> HTH - Tim > > >> > > >> > > >>> Begin Processing SUBDIRS: hpi version jvm redist verify fdlibm > java > > >> sun_nio > > >>> jli > > >>> main zip security npt java_crw_demo java_hprof_demo math awt util > > >> text > > >>> applet ne > > >>> t nio sql rmi jar beans logging management instrument > > >>>>>> Recursively making hpi all @ Mon Dec 17 23:40:21 PST 2007 ... > > >>> make[1]: Entering directory > > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > > >>> Begin Processing SUBDIRS: windows > > >>>>>> Recursively making windows all @ Mon Dec 17 23:40:25 PST 2007 > > ... > > >>> make[2]: Entering directory > > >>> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/wind > > >>> ows' > > >>> make[2]: *** No rule to make target > > >>> `../../../../build/windows-i586/btjars/strip > > >>> properties.jar', needed by `strip_all_props'. Stop. > > >>> make[2]: Leaving directory > > >>> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/windo > > >>> ws' > > >>> make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 > > >>> make[1]: Leaving directory > > >> `/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi' > > >>> make: *** [all] Error 1 > > >>> OpenJDK:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java > > >>> $ > > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.2/1185 - Release Date: > > >> 12/15/2007 12:00 PM > > >> > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.2/1185 - Release Date: > > 12/15/2007 > > > 12:00 PM > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.2/1185 - Release Date: > > 12/15/2007 12:00 PM > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.9/1197 - Release Date: > 12/25/2007 > 8:04 PM > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.9/1197 - Release Date: > 12/25/2007 8:04 PM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.9/1197 - Release Date: 12/25/2007 8:04 PM
