Dalibor Topic wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK
to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP,
and Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal.
I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' libc it provides?
cheers,
dalibor topic
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy.
There's just so much stuff dependent on the various Visual Studio or MS
SDK header files, that I'm almost positive you have to install them to
do the build, so why bother with GCC? (even from a Free Software point
of view, if you can't get away from the proprietary MS SDK/VisStudio,
then compiling with GCC rather than the MS-provided one isn't going to
be really any win at all).
As Dimitri indicated, we're at least partially there with moving to
completely Cygwin. I expect that the WinXP/VS2008 combo will no longer
require MKS at all. It would be nice if we could get Win2003/MS SDK
there also. [and, of course, for older releases (JDK 5/6), fixing
Win2000 so it doesn't need MKS would be nice, too]
--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop: usca22-123
Phone: x17195
Santa Clara, CA
Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)
