2009/5/21 Mark Reinhold <[email protected]>: >> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:17:21 +0100 >> From: Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> > >> Ok, new webrev created against jdk7/build: >> >> http://fuseyism.com/6841728/webrev.01/ > > Looks good to me -- go ahead and push when ready. >
Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/c06d30bd8c69 >> I presume I need to wait a bit due to the current block on pushes though. > > No, the group integration areas are already open for M4. > >>>> Is the standard format for such messages documented somewhere? >>> >>> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/producingChangeset.html#changesetComment >> >> Thanks. I'd forgotten about the developer guide. It was been >> discussed for a while, but then things seemed to go quiet. Is it now >> complete? > > No, unfortunately no one's had time to work on it, except for minor > changes, since the first version. What's there is still relatively > accurate. > Looks like the Contributed-by info is wrong. I tried adding the line as in the example and jcheck choked: remote: > Contributed-by: Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> remote: remote: Invalid contributor attribution remote: remote: abort: pretxnchangegroup.0.jcheck hook failed The example is Contributed-by: Ben Bitdiddle <ben at bits.org> > - Mark > Thanks, -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
