Thanks Tim, >>No need to remake target `c:/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/windows-i586/btbins/freetype_versioncheck.exe'. >What is the output when you run that executable in an MS-DOS CMD window? The exe file doesn't exist as the result of running make sanity, but if I cd /cygdrive/c/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/tools/freetypecheck make then the exe does get created and if I then run the exe from a DOS command line it works fine.
Here is what my PATH looks like: $ echo $PATH /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/Common7/IDE:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC/BIN:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/Common7/Tools:/ cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NE T/Framework/v2.0.50727:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC/ VCPackages:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.0A/bin:/cygdrive/ c/WINDOWS/system32:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/System32/Wbem:/cygdri ve/c/Program Files/Intel/WiFi/bin/:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/ATI Technologies/AT I.ACE/Core-Static:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Common Files/Lenovo:/cygdrive/c/Prog ram Files/Common Files/Roxio Shared/10.0/DLLShared/:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Co mmon Files/Roxio Shared/DLLShared/:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/ThinkPad/ConnectUti lities:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Lenovo/Client Security Solution:/cygdrive/c/Pro gram Files/Microsoft SQL Server/90/Tools/binn/:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/doxygen /bin:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Support Tools/:/cygdrive/c/utilities:/cygdrive/c/ Program Files/apache-ant-1.7.1:/cygdrive/c/Python26:/cygdrive/c/MinGW/bin:/cygdr ive/c/Program Files/KDiff3:/cygdrive/c/Program Files/QuickTime/QTSystem/ I'll have to cogitate on the rest of your note a bit later. Pete --- Tim Bell wrote: > Pete Brunet wrote: > >> I ran make -d sanity today and see the following. I don't know why it >> doesn't want to build freetype_versioncheck.exe. It doesn't exist. >> >> There is however a file named freetype_versioncheck.exe.manifest so to >> make sure that isn't a problem I commented out its build from >> freetypecheck/makefile and renamed it to >> freetype_versioncheck-OLD.exe.manifest in the btbins directory, but the >> debug make output looks the same after that test. >> > > sanity will need that .manifest file to run freetype_versioncheck.exe > > That was build bugID 6705913 "freetype_versioncheck.exe - Unable To Locate > Component" > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100101 > > (SNIP!) > > >> No need to remake target >> `c:/OpenJDK/jdk7/build/windows-i586/btbins/freetype_versioncheck.exe'. >> > > > What is the output when you run that executable in an MS-DOS CMD window? > > >> Tim, I went back to my original fixes (copy dll to lib and change the >> make to use freetype6.dll) then did the following: >> >> cd /cygdrive/c/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/tools/freetypecheck >> make clean >> make all >> >> and started getting a trace. I don't know if running from the >> freetypecheck directory is a valid thing to do, but when I do that I >> noticed that mt.exe is not found. In this (possibly invalid) invocation >> of make, $(MT) resolves to >> >> c:/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/Common7/Tools/../../Vc/Bin/mt aka "C:\Program >> Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin\mt" >> >> but on my system mt.exe is at >> >> C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\bin\mt.exe >> >> If I change $(MT) to just mt so it's found via the PATH then the above >> build is OK. >> > > That is what my build is doing. $(CL) and $(MT) are both found on PATH, ahead > of the Cygwin bin directories. But I also set the ALT_ variables in my > environment > and build scripts (see below). > > $ echo $PATH > /cygdrive/c/JDK16~1.0_0/bin:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/Common7/IDE:/cygdriv > e/c/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/BIN:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/Common7/Tools:/cy > gdrive/c/PROGRA~1/MICROS~2/Windows/v6.1/bin:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/MICROS~1.NET/FRA > MEW~1/V20~1.507:/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/VCPACK~1:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ > bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS:/cygdri > ve/c/WINDOWS/System32/Wbem:/cygdrive/c/Mercurial:/cygdrive/g/jtreg/4.0/win32/bin > > > >> However, even with that fix, when I do make sanity the normal way the >> exe isn't being built. And no matter what I try (echo, $(warning ...) I >> can't get make to trace when I run make sanity the normal way. >> > > I wish I could say incremental builds worked well in OpenJDK7. In some > areas of the code it works, but other areas are problematical. > > When I want to be sure, I use a 'big hammer' approach to start building > with a clean slate: > > cd <to the top of your forest> > mkdir lose > mv build lose > \rm -rf lose > . $HOME/openjdk.env.bash > ../openjdk.build.bash > > My OpenJDK build using these scripts has already built as far > as jdk/make/sun/rmi > > > I put copies of my openjdk.env.bash and openjdk.build.bash files here: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tbell/OpenJDK-build-scripts/ > > You will need to modify these to suit the setup on your PC, but they > should serve as a guide. > > I hope this helps. > > Feel free to contact me off the alias with your full build log > if you need to. I will take a look at it. > > Tim > > >
