Martin Buchholz wrote: > Hi Max, > > Sounds to me like you're using a very recent gcc.
Probably, I'm using the gcc of 'apt-get install' on this 9.04. > My policy has been to use a stodgy gcc, > and let other folks use bleeding edge. > Fedora/Ubuntu hackers are more likely > to dogfood their gcc.... so check out the > icedtea patch set. Ok, I'll go have a look. Thanks Max > > I wish that Openjdk release engineering maintained > buildability by a broad range of compilers > through regular testing. > > Martin > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 18:05, Max (Weijun) Wang <weijun.w...@sun.com> wrote: >> Hi Martin >> >> I've just changed my Linux box to a x86_64 one, and my first build of JDK 7 >> shows these errors: >> >> ... >> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors >> /media/sda6/space/work/myjdk/hotspot/src/cpu/x86/vm/methodHandles_x86.cpp: >> In function ‘void trace_method_handle_stub(const char*, oopDesc*, intptr_t*, >> intptr_t*)’: >> /media/sda6/space/work/myjdk/hotspot/src/cpu/x86/vm/methodHandles_x86.cpp:276: >> error: format ‘%016lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has >> type ‘void*’ >> /media/sda6/space/work/myjdk/hotspot/src/cpu/x86/vm/methodHandles_x86.cpp:276: >> error: format ‘%016lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has >> type ‘intptr_t*’ >> make[7]: *** [methodHandles_x86.o] Error 1 >> ... >> >> What am I missing here? and, do you have any private patches to share? >> >> Thanks >> Max >> >>
