On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:

Back on the 9th I fcloned from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/ jdk7/, i.e.
cd \OpenJDK-b96
hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/ jdk7

Today I did a local fclone, e.g.
cd \OpenJDK-b96m
hg fclone \OpenJDK-b96\jdk7 jdk7

That resulted in an almost exact clone. The only difference I see is that in the source jdk7/jdk/make/tools/jarreorder there is a reorder subdirectory but in the local clone that reorder directory is instead up one level at jdk7/jdk/make/tools.

Does that make sense?

Makes sense if the original clone had been worked on, and the working set files changed. Mercurial does not manage directories, just files. Empty directories don't mean much to it.

Try running something like:   hg fstatus -radium
On each forest, that will show you exactly what in the working set files are renamed,
added, deleted, ignored, unknown, or modified.

The working set files are not really part of the repository data, just a set of read-write files for you to make changes with, the .hg directories hold the real repository data.

-kto


--
Pete Brunet

a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development
(512) 238-6967 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell)
Skype: pete.brunet
IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), ptbru...@live.com (MSN)
http://www.a11ysoft.com/about/
Ionosphere: WS4G

Reply via email to