On 03/10/11 08:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
Mandy Chung wrote:
Oops... how can I miss that!! I'll file a new CR and push this. For
7024172, it will be at least 1-2 weeks since we need to submit for
CCC approval.
Here is the patch.
diff --git a/make/java/nio/FILES_java.gmk b/make/java/nio/FILES_java.gmk
--- a/make/java/nio/FILES_java.gmk
+++ b/make/java/nio/FILES_java.gmk
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
java/nio/ByteOrder.java \
java/nio/MappedByteBuffer.java \
java/nio/StringCharBuffer.java \
+ java/nio/BufferPoolMXBean.java \
\
java/nio/channels/AsynchronousByteChannel.java \
java/nio/channels/AsynchronousChannel.java \
Minor nit is that these are organized alphabetically. You might be
okay without as it will be compiled implicitly anyway (I'm not saying
we should rely on that, but we could get by until you have the changes
for 7024172 pushed).
I did get compiled without this. Now I get your point. As I'll be
fixing 7024172 that will remove this line from FILES_java.gmk, it may
well leave it as it.
That sounds good.
Mandy
