For jpeg its something we could consider for JDK 8 although I think its been
called libjpeg since JDK 1.0 without apparent problems.
But this JDK libxinerama is only for Solaris (SPARC, specifically), and
on Solaris
Xinerama functionality has always lived in libXext.so, so there's no clash.
Solaris 11 SPARC (with X.org) is the only case this might be an issue.
-phil.
On 4/12/2011 3:58 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 13:46 Tue 12 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Some shared libraries do not have and will not have mapfiles, at least for now,
we
give these an exception to the mapfile check (which just issues a warning).
7033957: Library built without a mapfile: libxinerama.so
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-mapfile-warning-sparc/webrev/
-kto
On a related note, is it wise to have these libraries using the same names as
system
libraries? libxinerama is the same as libXinerama with the exception of case.
I
believe the JDK also has a libjpeg which is identically named to the system
install.
Could it not be libjxinerama.so, libjavajpeg.so or some such?
