FYI here is proposed webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/7130909/webrev/
CR 7130909 was filed.
David
On 19/01/2012 1:30 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Kelly,
On 19/01/2012 2:22 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On Jan 17, 2012, at 7:17 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 18/01/2012 7:07 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Generally, I have no objection to this change.
But instead of setting it to NO_SUCH_PATH, I would not set it at
all, and avoid the $(shell) to see if it
exists completely. Just don't set CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR if it does not exist.
Then you don't need the HAS_CUSTOM_MAKE, it can just be ifdef
CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR
But I/we want the default setting to occur in the build files and not
require that it be set externally. My final suggestion gets rid of
the HAS_CUSTOM_MAKE and the shell usage. Incorporating your
suggestion it simplifies to:
ifneq ($(OPENJDK),true)
CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR = $(BUILDDIR)/closed
endif
Or something like:
# Custom makefile additions
ifneq ($(OPENJDK),true)
CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR = $(BUILDDIR)/closed
# This directory should exist if OPENJDK is not "true"
ifeq ($(shell if [ ! -d $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR) ]; then echo "missing";
fi),missing)
x:=$(error "ERROR: Not OPENJDK, and missing $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR)")
endif
endif
Not sure we need to force it to be available. Seems this kind of thing
belongs in a sanity test if anywhere, but personally I don't think it
has to be enforced.
in Defs.gmk and then:
-include $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR)/<path-to-file.gmk>
And:
# Custom makefile additions
ifdef CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR
include $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR)/<path-to-file.gmk>
endif
The -include is accounting not only for the directory not being present
but also the actual file. Over time we may add these include hooks to
support a number of different use-cases but that doesn't mean that
anybody involved in any single use-case needs to provide every single
custom file that might exist.
as needed. Though I may get an error with CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR being
undefined in which case I'll need to declare it for OpenJDK builds.
Undefined is the same as being defined as empty in terms of expansion
$(var)
Was unsure as I see examples where people ensure a variable is always
defined in both an if and else clause - even if one is empty.
Thanks,
David
-----
Not sure I like the word CUSTOM, but that's just a name debate.
It customizes the build logic. I preferred it to the "alt" name we
use for hotspot as here it isn't an alternative but an addition.
Anyway just a name game.
Not a big deal, but kind of liked the piggyback idea. ;^)
-kto
Thanks,
David
Maybe ADDON or MODDING or MODS or oo oo PIGGYBACK? ;^)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cHeD4qJSB44/TbMtSsAiY4I/AAAAAAAAA1c/gctQfVffu_o/s1600/PiggyBack.jpg
-kto
On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:01 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Presently the build system contains some files, and directives
involving those files, that supports the building of the Java SE
Embedded product. What I would like to do is remove direct support
for this and replace it with a more general mechanism that allows
for custom make files to be included from an arbitrary location -
which then allows for the removal of the embedded specific files.
Initially I've modeled this on some other conditional mechanisms by
defining the default location for non-OpenJDK builds, checking its
existence and then using that as a guard for the individual files.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/custom-make/webrev/
! ifneq ($(OPENJDK),true)
! CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR_REL=closed
! else
! CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR_REL=NO_SUCH_PATH
! endif
! CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR=$(BUILDDIR)/$(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR_REL)
+ # Use this variable to guard inclusion of the custom files
+ HAS_CUSTOM_MAKE := $(shell if [ -d $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR) ]; then
echo 1; else echo 0; fi)
...
+ ifeq ($(HAS_CUSTOM_MAKE),1)
+ include $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR)/Defs.gmk
+ endif
Initially there are only two hooks for these custom files:
1. At the end common/Defs.gmk (as it gets included by all the
Makefiles)
2. In the top-level JDK Makefile, including a custom Release.gmk
Naturally these map to the existing uses of the *-embedded.gmk files.
It then occurred to me that if someone wanted to add an additional
hook somewhere else, that it might be best to check for the
existence of the actual file rather than a root directory for all
such files. That led me to consider a function
custom_include(<filename>) to hide the existence logic. But I
wasn't sure if a function could contain an include directive and
upon checking on that I discovered a much simpler approach: the
-include directive. This is like the include directive but does not
trigger an error if the file does not exist. So we would simply
have this in Defs.gmk:
ifneq ($(OPENJDK),true)
CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR_REL=closed
else
CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR_REL=NO_SUCH_PATH
endif
CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR=$(BUILDDIR)/$(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR_REL)
and then
-include $(CUSTOM_MAKE_DIR)/<path-to-file.gmk>
wherever we needed it (again initially only the two locations I
mentioned).
I'd like to hear people's opinions on this.
Thanks,
David
