Since I haven't heard any more comments from Erik/Kelly, I would like to push the changeset without the new build infra patch. Erik/Kelly, can you please give us an official "GO" in terms of the build related changes?

Aside from build changes, I have updated the changeset based on an internal review:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/6336885/webrev.01/

This includes:

- a couple of fixes to the CLDR Converter
- Added fallback for any bad SPI implementations which return null for requested instances.

Still asking for review comments.

Naoto

On 8/8/12 2:13 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
On 8/7/12 2:57 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
See inline

On 2012-07-13 22:20, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Something seems strange here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/6336885/webrev.00/make/java/java/localegen.sh.sdiff.html


It's like someone was avoiding overall quotes, but using them to add
spaces somehow...
I sure would like to get rid of this shell logic, seems like there are
lots repeated logic that
this script does over and over or could be done with makefile pattern
subst's instead of exec's.
The new version isn't any worse than the old in my opinion. In
build-infra, this file is indeed replaced with make logic. After having
decoded both versions I'm confident in converting the changes.
Overall, just looking at the makefiles, the build-infra team may need
some time to fully absorb this into the
new makefiles, some of it will be trivial, not sure all of it will be.

I have applied the patch to a clone of build-infra and done the minimal
changes to keep build-infra building, which was rather trivial. The
resulting build has large differences since I haven't converted all of
it yet. There are a couple of things that will require some more work,
but not more than a day or two.
Not sure how to proceed here, the build-infra team does need an action
item to deal with this, maybe
before it gets integrated because I suspect the new makefiles will
break with all the filename or
directory changes. But I hate to hold up your integration plans.
I see these as possible options:

1. Let this go in, build-infra will break in jdk8 until we do our next
push and it trickles through the repos.
2. The build-infra project provides a patch with the full conversion
that can go in together with these changes.
3. The build-infra project provides a simple patch which just keeps the
build-infra-build from failing that can go in with these changes.

The conversion needs to happen regardless of option. The changes
required are pretty isolated from remaining build-infra work. What do
you think?

Either way is fine with me. If build-infra team prefers 2 or 3, please
give me the patch, and I will go ahead and merge them to my changeset.

Naoto


Other than that, I have no objections to the review.

/Erik

I'd like to get some advice from Erik on this before saying anything
further.

-kto

On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:

Hello,

Please review the JDK8 changes for JEP 127: Improve Locale Data
Packaging and Adopt Unicode CLDR Data
(http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/127). The webrev is located at:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/6336885/webrev.00/

The main bug id for this enhancement is:

6336885: RFE: Locale Data Deployment Enhancements

Along with this, the following bugs/enhancements are also implemented
in this change:

4609153 Provide locale data for Indic locales
5104387 Support for gl_ES locale (galician language)
6337471 desktop/system locale preferences support
7056139 (cal) SPI support for locale-dependent Calendar parameters
7058206 Provide CalendarData SPI for week params and display field
value names
7073852 Support multiple scripts for digits and decimal symbols per
locale
7079560 [Fmt-Da] Context dependent month names support in
SimpleDateFormat
7171324 getAvailableLocales() of locale sensitive services should
return the actual availability of locales
7151414 (cal) Support calendar type identification
7168528 LocaleServiceProvider needs to be aware of Locale extensions
7171372 (cal) locale's default Calendar should be created if unknown
calendar is specified

Please note that packaging changes that relate to Jigsaw module
system aren't included in this changeset.

Naoto Sato and Masayoshi Okutsu


Reply via email to