----- Original Message ----- > > > On 9/18/2012 7:39 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > The following simple webrev will achieve what I think is needed: > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/100062/webrev.01/ > > > > allowing OpenJDK to be built with the unlimited rather than limited > > crypto policy in place. > > I got a chance to talk to Valerie, and what you've done looks good. > I'm > "wetmore" if you need a reviewer, and I think Kelly has looked at it > too.
Thanks Brad. > > > I just placed it within the OPENJDK ifdef so it > > won't interfere with the proprietary build at all, as obviously I > > can't test it > > Please leave your new code check within the "ifdef OPENJDK". > > Will you be putting this back yourself? If so let me know when you > go > in, and I can update the bug once you're in. > I will, though I'll need a bug ID for it. I presume tl is ok as the forest to use? > Mark wrote: > > The summary is that it was just easier to remove unused classes > > that > > made the code tricky to understand for no good reason except for > > some > > secret proprietary code. > > Unfortunately, Oracle and some of our commercial (non-OpenJDK) > licensees > still depend on that tricky code. :( I'd personally love to strip > it > all out, but we have to balance all of its consumers (Oracle SE and > ME, > commercial source/binary licensees, OpenJDK, etc.) > > Andrew wrote: > > I'm sure it would be easy enough to dump those classes if Oracle > > started producing OpenJDK binaries licensed under the GPL, rather > > than binaries from their proprietary fork. > > Unfortunately, not likely in our current export/import climate. > Yes, this is what I thought. We just have to make sure to test well before shipping binaries. > Brad > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
