Thanks Ulf, that was my exact point Ulf. Although, you were much more eloquent.
One of the most consistent things that Java has done is ensuring backwards compatibility. The removal of something like the JDBC-ODBC bridge will cause issues later. We tell people to upgrade all the time. Security problems arise and we patch them followed by a message to tell folks to upgrade. The consumer JRE even has a reminder application which asks them if they want to upgrade. One click, and their applications stop working. Although I don't do anything now with MS Access, I see these nice Swing applications which end up with an Access database. The software that runs a number of Yoga studios has this configuration. It is the small businesses which rely on the cheaper Access based applications which will have problems. If ever there was a case for Jigsaw this is it. Oracle if you don't want to upgrade, or enhance it that is OK. However, leave it there for those who need it. Just my thoughts. John ____________________________ John Yeary ____________________________ *NetBeans Dream Team* *President Greenville Java Users Group Java Users Groups Community Leader Java Enterprise Community Leader* ____________________________ <http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com/> <https://twitter.com/jyeary> <http://www.youtube.com/johnyeary> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jyeary> <https://plus.google.com/112146428878473069965> <http://www.facebook.com/jyeary> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/JavaEvangelistJohnYearysBlog> <http://netbeans.org/people/84414-jyeary> "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat." -- Theodore Roosevelt On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@cosoco.de> wrote: > Am 26.10.2012 23:39, schrieb Alan Bateman: > > >> The JDBC-ODBC bridge has never been in OpenJDK, it's just the make files. >> > > I know, but is it still in Oracle JDK? > > > I don't think it has really been necessary for many years anyway as so >> many JDBC drivers available. >> > > For a quick connection to a MS Access DB it has been useful, even if not > perfect. > I'm not aware of any other free or open source JDBC-driver to connect to > ... > ... and MS Access is widely used by "semi-professionals" ;-) > > -Ulf > >
