Do you expecte me to test it?I will be glad to, just that I never before built a patch, only from main branches. On Jun 27, 2013 12:14 PM, "Erik Joelsson" <erik.joels...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Would be great if someone could take a look at this, thanks. > > /Erik > > On 2013-06-11 12:18, Erik Joelsson wrote: > >> I managed to fix this with a rather simple patch. The whole thing is a >> bit of a mess, but this at least restores the advertised functionality. >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**erikj/8016303/webrev.root.01/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8016303/webrev.root.01/> >> >> /Erik >> >> On 2013-06-11 09:57, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> >>> There seems to be a bug with that logic. The correct way is supposed to >>> be: >>> >>> make CONF= >>> >>> I'm filing a bug for it: 8016303 >>> >>> /Erik >>> >>> On 2013-06-10 14:08, Boaz Nahum wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> I'm successfully building two configurations on windows (lambda/lambda) >>>> >>>> make CONF=windows-x86-normal-**server-release images >>>> make CONF=windows-x86_64-normal-**server-release images >>>> >>>> But when I try to build them both: >>>> >>>> $ make CONF= images >>>> Building target 'images' in the following configurations (matching >>>> CONF=): >>>> * windows-x86-normal-server-**release >>>> * windows-x86_64-normal-server-**release >>>> make: *** common/makefiles: Is a directory. Stop. >>>> make: *** No rule to make target `images'. Stop. >>>> >>>> The help says: >>>> >>>> Useful make variables >>>> . make CONF= # Build all configurations (note, assignment >>>> is >>>> empty) >>>> >>>> I also tried (found in README-builds.html): >>>> make all-conf images >>>> >>>> Is there other way to build all configurations ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Boaz >>>> >>>
