On 04/25/2014 08:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Yes, it's bad if we "pollute" OpenJDK makefiles with references to > Oracle, but the damage really is already done since we already have all > this Oracle specific stuff in them, just hidden under a "not-open" > label. I think we should indeed make it explicit rather than pretending > it's not there.
It might actually be better from the POV of the non-Oracle community to expose as much of the closed build as possible. At the moment we can't tell that we might break things we can't see: at least if they were visible we'd have a clue. Andrew.
