Hiya Dave ,
On 30/09/14 18:57, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 1/10/2014 2:05 AM, pointo1d wrote:
<snip>
For general cross-compilation we just set extra-cflags to pass things
like this through; and don't set the --with-target-bits option.
Aside: I would think that supporting 31-bit would require a huge
number of changes to the sources (unless it is somehow masked by the
C/C++ compiler.
David H.
TIA & rgds ,
TFT fast response Dave.
I did play with that, but having invoked configure as ...
/home/foreman/sandbox/source/configure
--with-boot-jdk=/home/foreman/sandbox/bootjvm/sdk80
--with-import-hotspot=/home/foreman/sandbox/bootjvm/sdk80
--with-cups-include=/home/foreman/sandbox/thirdparty/include/cups
--with-alsa-include=/home/foreman/sandbox/thirdparty/include
--with-extra-cflags="-m31 -DIBM_DBGMALLOC
-I/home/foreman/sandbox/thirdparty/include -I/usr/include/freetype2"
--with-extra-ldflags="-m31 -L/usr/X11R6/lib"
--with-extra-cxxflags="-m31" --openjdk-target=s390-linux
--with-boot-jdk-jvmargs=-Xmx800m --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib
I always encounter the configure error ...
checking size of int *... 8
configure: The tested number of bits in the target (64) differs from the
number of bits expected to be found in the target (31).
configure: I'll retry after setting the platforms compiler target bits
flag to -m31
checking size of int *... 4
configure: error: The tested number of bits in the target (32) differs
from the number of bits expected to be found in the target (31)
configure exiting with result code 1
--
​Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS - Contractor engaged by IBM
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work before we count the
cost and
before we we judge rightly of our strength to go thro' with it - Robinson Crusoe
