Hi David, I’ve got a mail that the attachment was too big and was held by the moderator approval. I personally would love to put that on cr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> but to put it there it seems that I fist has to be contributor and in order to be that I had be submit some patches first :-(
It seems I’m stuck in a recursive loop somehow ;-) Cheers Patrick PS: I did already contributed two fixes for the 2d printing part in the past. > Am 14.11.2014 um 09:01 schrieb David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>: > > On 14/11/2014 5:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >> An attachment in the email has been found to contain executable code and has >> been removed. >> >> File removed : webrev.zip, zip,html,js > > Unclear what removed the attachment. :( > > David > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Attached the webrev >> >> >> >> >> >>> Am 14.11.2014 um 03:18 schrieb David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>: >>> >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> On 14/11/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >>>> Hi Magnus, >>>> >>>> I actually merged down the freetype compilation from the source during the >>>> configuration cycle as it’s being done in JDK9 actually. This was not that >>>> straightforward but I could sort that out and had a successful compilation >>>> afterwards. >>>> >>>> Here is the link to the webrev: >>>> http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/ >>>> <http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/> >>> >>> Please note that patches have to be submitted via OpenJDK infrastructure: >>> cr.openjdk.java.net or email attachment to OpenJDK mailing list. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> David >>> >>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/tou/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 13.11.2014 um 14:50 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie >>>>> <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>: >>>>> >>>>> On 2014-11-12 19:34, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m updating the Adopt OpenJDK website with build instructions to build >>>>>> the OpenJDK on Windows 8.1. In order to lower the effort of building >>>>>> also the OpenJDK 8 on Windows, myself and some colleges have back ported >>>>>> the build scripts from OpenJDK 9. We also could provide a webrev >>>>>> containing all changes we made. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could someone sponsor this back port? >>>>> >>>>> Sure, I can sponsor that! >>>>> >>>>> Is the patch straightforward to apply on jdk9 from jdk8? >>>>> >>>>> /Magnus >>>> >>
