On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 05/12/2014 17:34, Alan Bateman wrote: >> >> On 05/12/2014 17:26, Volker Simonis wrote: >>> >>> But why do we need an exception if setting the executable flags fails >>> on 'jspawnhelper' and don't need on if it fails on the executables. >>> We'll actually never notice that 'jspawnhelper' isn't executable if we >>> can't execute 'java', right? >>> >> It is consistent, we should fix that. > > > s/consistent/inconsistent/
Agree, but which way round? Is it OK to use File.setExecutable() on all executables or should I use ImageBuilder.setExecutable() which has the problem of throwing an exception on non-posix file systems?
