On 8/01/2015 9:05 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
LLVM < 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
C++11 yet. (are there any plans about this?) I'd recommend LLVM 3.4.2.
C++11? We still have workarounds for compilers that don't support C99 :(
David
Roman
Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015 um 11:03 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
Hello Roman,
This addition looks good to me.
Thinking about what the others said, it might be inconvenient to have
all this be pushed to different forests. I tried applying all the
changes to jdk9/hs-rt, but I can't seem to build zeroshark.. Did you
have more hotspot changes to be able to finish the build?
My failure is:
ciTypeFlow.o
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci/ciTypeFlow.cpp
In file included from
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/regmask.hpp:29:0,
from
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/compile.hpp:40,
from
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci/ciTypeFlow.cpp:38:
/localhome/hg/jdk9-hs-rt/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/optoreg.hpp:40:39:
fatal error: adfiles/adGlobals_zero.hpp: No such file or directory
From what I can see, adfiles are not generated for zero or zeroshark
builds, so the include should probably be removed.
Would you still like me to push what you currently have to hs-rt?
/Erik
On 2015-01-07 21:21, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
When I built Zero and Shark on my Raspberry Pi, I noticed another
problem when copying jvm.cfg into the right places. I fixed it in a
similar way as I did for the SA stuff:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-jdk/webrev.02/
I think that should be all for now.
Please push that into JDK9 if you think that's fine.
Best regards,
Roman
Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:49 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
On 2015-01-07 17:29, Roman Kennke wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
Do you have a bug for this?
No.
I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible in the
meantime for me to create my own bugs? Otherwise, please file one for
me :-)
You should be able to log in to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net and create
bugs since you have an OpenJDK identity.
Done:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068598
While I'm at it, is it possible for me to push my own changes (except
hotspot of course)? If yes, what needs to be done for regenerating the
configure files? Simply run autogen.sh in common/autoconf with whatever
version of autotools I have? Or doesn't it make sense at all b/c you
need to regenerate your closed scripts?
It requires you to run common/autogen.sh yes, and that will require you
to have autoconf 2.69 installed. But since we also need to regenerate
the closed version, I can take care of the push for you. Will do it
tomorrow if that's ok?
/Erik
Roman
