I was wrong - that didn’t resolve my issue.
> On Apr 17, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Jim Laskey (Oracle) <james.las...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > java.lang.module.ResolveException: Hash of java.security.jgss > (IPAH/Z1wbzCE8aG78apqik6QR94TaBJqcatAkW+35rs=) differs to expected hash > (O61Gv4243oRyV7LoD/FjaNBXgRtREFjG4p1Q//V8cGI=) > at java.lang.module.Resolver.fail(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:416) > at > java.lang.module.Resolver.checkHashes(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:407) > at java.lang.module.Resolver.resolve(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:135) > at > java.lang.module.Configuration.resolve(java.base@9.0/Configuration.java:80) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.createImage(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:294) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.run(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:232) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.run(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:215) > at jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.Main.main(jdk.jlink@9.0/Main.java:33) > make[3]: *** > [/Projects/jake/build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/jdk-server/bin/java] > Error 4 > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > java.lang.module.ResolveException: Hash of java.security.sasl > (RYmhSNVe20U0aKdkVmf4uTxhPRSdUbJu/q8UxQmGLX8=) differs to expected hash > (OCim25Rq6hJk4uJiHwkeT7snnHemh3co4JmweYOfxGc=) > at java.lang.module.Resolver.fail(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:416) > at > java.lang.module.Resolver.checkHashes(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:407) > at java.lang.module.Resolver.resolve(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:135) > at > java.lang.module.Configuration.resolve(java.base@9.0/Configuration.java:80) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.createImage(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:294) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.run(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:232) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.run(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:215) > at jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.Main.main(jdk.jlink@9.0/Main.java:33) > java.lang.module.ResolveException: Hash of java.security.sasl > (RYmhSNVe20U0aKdkVmf4uTxhPRSdUbJu/q8UxQmGLX8=) differs to expected hash > (OCim25Rq6hJk4uJiHwkeT7snnHemh3co4JmweYOfxGc=) > at java.lang.module.Resolver.fail(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:416) > at > java.lang.module.Resolver.checkHashes(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:407) > at java.lang.module.Resolver.resolve(java.base@9.0/Resolver.java:135) > at > java.lang.module.Configuration.resolve(java.base@9.0/Configuration.java:80) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.createImage(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:294) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.run(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:232) > at > jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.JlinkTask.run(jdk.jlink@9.0/JlinkTask.java:215) > at jdk.jigsaw.tools.jlink.Main.main(jdk.jlink@9.0/Main.java:33) > > > Is there any way we can not use the full canonical path for hash generation. > I generally operate off a soft link for my projects and this obviously bungs > up hash generation. I have to add PWD=`pwd -p` to make configure work > correctly. > > — Jim > >
