Looks reasonable to me. Cheers, Henry
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 4:49 AM, Jan Lahoda <jan.lah...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Bug: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129562 > > As part of the fix for JDK-8054717, CompileJavaModules.gmk is now using an > "empty" bootclasspath (classes like java.lang.Object are loaded from the > ordinary classpath as needed). Unfortunately, javac is still using the > default ext and endorsed dirs (if available in the boot JDK), and classes > that are in the ext dirs have precedence over the classes from the classpath. > Which may cause compilation problems with the ext dirs contain an older > version of a class. > > The proposal is to make ext and endorsed dirs "empty" as well (both ext and > endorsed dirs will contain one entry, and the entry will be an empty > directory): > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8129562/webrev.00/ > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Jan
