On 16/11/2015 6:22 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:


On 2015-11-16 03:10, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,

On 13/11/2015 9:33 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-11-13 09:13, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,

make/bsd/makefiles/amd64.make:
make/bsd/makefiles/gcc.make:
Perhaps the order of "$(OPT_CFLAGS/NOOPT) $(OPT_CFLAGS/$(BUILDARCH))"
should be reversed to guarantee that NOOPT is the one used in case
BUILDARCH contains something that conflicts? The solaris file does it
this way.
You know you wrote that code originally? ;-)

Yeah, I agree, it's more reasonable. Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8142909-hotspot-build-infra-integration/webrev.02


I don't like this particular change as it is too generic. It gives the
appearance of being apply to apply whatever the BUILDARCH specific
optflags are, which makes no sense if the whole point here is to not
optimize these files. If all this is intended to do is include -g then
I think that should be done explicitly.

The -g flag is added to OPT_CFLAGS/$(BUILDARCH) and I can only assume
the intention was to have it added to all compilation command lines.
However, the OPT_CFLAGS/<filename> variable overrides
CFLAGS/$(BUILDARCH), effectively removing the -g flag from the files
where we explicitly change the optimization level. The patch intends to
make sure -g is used on those files too.

I understand that, but it is far from obvious that OPT_FLAGS/BUILDARCH means -g (why???), or that putting other things in that variable might break files that should not be optimized.

A cleaner solution would be to not have -g be part of the OPT flags at
all but its own set of DEBUG_CFLAGS.

I thought -g was in the DEBUG_CFLAGS ?? Or maybe it used to be. Anyway if all we are interested in is adding -g then I agree it should have its own variable.

---

make/bsd/makefiles/saproc.make

! # Order src files alfabetically

That would be "alphabetically". But that list doesn't seem alphabetic
anyway: MacosxDebuggerLocal.m would come after libproc_impl.c; and
$(AGENTDIR) should come first. I really see no point in forcing such
lists to be in alphabetic order.

This is to make comparison of binaries between the old hotspot build and
the new hotspot build easier. In build-infra, we $(sort ) the object
files before linking to get a reproducible order. The linker output is
affected by the order of the object files. By making sure the old and
the new build sorts them the same way, we get cleaner comparisons and
can more easily detect other types of differences through those
comparisons. The sort order isn't strictly alphabetical, it's on byte
order so upper case goes before lower case.

I saw the change for the ordered object files on Windows, but this simply orders source files in a list. Not sure how that has any affect on the linking ??

Cheers,
David

/Erik
make/linux/makefiles/saproc.make doesn't have the comment that was
added for bsd.

----

make/solaris/makefiles/amd64.make

Similar issue with bsd amd64.make. Not sure what you are trying to
achieve here - is it some kind of last option wins situation ?

---

make/windows/create_obj_files.sh

Harmless I guess but not sure about relevance of sort order here.

----

 src/share/vm/adlc/adlparse.cpp

So that's where that comes from! :)

---

src/share/vm/gc/g1/g1EvacStats.cpp

I don't see anything in the cpp files that uses anything from the
atomic class ???


Thanks,
David



/Magnus


Otherwise looks good.

/Erik

On 2015-11-13 03:34, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
In the new hotspot build project, we have made a few changes to the
existing build. In preparation for the new build, I'd like to
integrate these into mainline.

These changes are:
* When overriding optimization, do not lose current debug (-g)
setting (!)
* Make adlc actually quiet in quiet mode
* Make g1EvacStats.cpp compile in all cases without precompiled
headers
* Sort saproc object files when linking (facilitates comparison to
new build)

Unless someone suggests otherwise, I intend to push this (using JPRT)
to hs-rt.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8142909
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8142909-hotspot-build-infra-integration/webrev.01



/Magnus



Reply via email to