Differences are extensive in most C++ object files. The problem with
viewing dissassembly diffs is that any difference tend to change all
addresses later in the file.
/Erik
On 2016-02-04 13:43, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I will investigate and report back.
/Erik
On 2016-02-04 13:29, David Holmes wrote:
On 4/02/2016 9:27 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2016-02-03 14:33, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2016-02-03 13:59, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 3/02/2016 10:48 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Please review this small fix for building on Solaris using a
devkit/sysroot. The Solaris Studio compiler does special inlining
and
intrinsics with system calls, like memcpy. The problem is that it
only
seems to do this if it finds the definition of the system call in a
header file in the /usr/include directory. See bug description and
comments for details.
I have found a way to work around this. Internally, the compiler
adds
the option -I-xbuiltin to mark the start of the system header
includes
when calling a sub process. By adding this to our SYSROOT_CFLAGS,
the
special inlining is re-enabled.
We have no way of knowing whether that will mess with the compilers
use of other header files. We seem to be on very thin ice here. We
know it fixes this one problem, but we don't know what else it may
do!
That is true. But then, we don't really know what else this compiler
is doing anyway, as is evident by your latest discovery. The way we
live with this is testing. We use the setup we have until it proves
not to work, we fix and we test. I'm just trying to do the best I can
with what we have. I would much prefer to ditch SS for gcc/clang
(where we seem to have way less problems) if it was my choice. I'm not
ready to give up the convenience of devkits/portable sysroots just
because one of the compilers we (have to) use needs a bit of special
handling to behave properly.
I agree that this is a situation that's not really comfortable. :( But,
as with many other things with the solaris studio compiler, in the end
it's a result of the limited functionality of that compiler (in this
case, the lack of a properly functioning --sysroot alternative).
So in light of that, and Erik's comment about testing as the only
way to
be sure, I'd like to see Eriks fix get in.
Do we have the means to do a binary comparison of the object files
before/after the change to ascertain what kind of affect this is having?
Thanks,
David
/Magnus
/Erik
