On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:28 AM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Volker, > > On 6/06/2016 11:59 PM, Volker Simonis wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to get the following tiny bug fix into jdk9-dev. What's the >> current procedure to get this change approved? > > > No approvals needed for bug fixes until RDP1 later in the year. Only > enhancements need approval post FC and that process has not yet been setup. >
Ah, good to know. >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8158763/ >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158763 >> >> On Solaris, the configure test for libstlport.so.1 isn't disabled by >> --disable-hotspot-gtest. So, if libstlport.so.1 isn't present, the >> build will break during configuration even if we set >> --disable-hotspot-gtest. >> >> The fix is trivial - just guard the test for libstlport.so.1 by >> "x$BUILD_GTEST" = "xtrue". >> >> The fix also adds an alternative location for libstlport.so.1 (from >> SS12u3) to keep the sources compilable with SS12u3. > > > This looks fine to me and I can sponsor it (need to regenerate closed > generated-configure.sh). I'd also prefer to see this go into jdk9/hs if that > is okay? > Thanks a lot David. Pushing it to jdk9/hs first is fine for me. Regards, Volker > Thanks, > David > ----- > > >> >> Thank you and best regards, >> Volker >> >
