Looks better to me!

/Staffan

> On 28 Nov 2016, at 13:52, Erik Joelsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, but unfortunately, the build breaks again later. Updated webrev in 
> place.
> 
> /Erik
> 
> 
> On 2016-11-28 13:49, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> Looks good to me!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> /Staffan
>> 
>>> On 28 Nov 2016, at 13:41, Erik Joelsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In JDK-8031567, the format for storing source revision information for use 
>>> in builds from source bundles changed. The behavior when building without 
>>> either mercurial or the stored revision information also changed. We used 
>>> to silently ignore the lack of source revision information, but now the 
>>> build fails.
>>> 
>>> Since it's not an uncommon use case in our Oracle internal infrastructure 
>>> (JPRT, Mach 5) to have builds without either mercurial or stored revision 
>>> information, this needs to be downgraded this to at most a warning.
>>> 
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170392
>>> 
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8170392/webrev.01/
>>> 
>>> /Erik
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to