On 2017-03-13 09:17, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,

Nice to see this handled by make.

In UpdateBuildDocs.gmk, the test for PANDOC can be moved out of the macro body and just be executed once.
I started out that way, but thought the check more properly belonged in the function. But then again, the entire file depends on pandoc, so sure, I'll move it back :-)

In the recipe, you call CheckLineLength, which I don't see defined anywhere, but then the logic just after the call looks like what would be the implementation.

Yeah... It used to be a separate function but then I inlined it. Removed the call now.

Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8176509-use-pandoc-for-build-readme/webrev.04

/Magnus

/Erik


On 2017-03-10 15:50, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Since JDK-8139668, the build README html file has been generated from a markdown source.

Unfortunately, this implementation used the original markdown (from https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/), which was quite limited, and did not for instance allow for tables.

Now that JEP 299 is about to standardize on using pandoc to convert markdown to man pages, I think it would be reasonable to use it to convert the build README to html as well.

I also used this opportunity to clean up redundant and/or incorrect information spread in the READMEs all over the forest, and to move the build READMEs to a better location.

Please note that the *content* of the README file is severly outdated (not to mention unstructured and sometimes irrelevant), but updating that is not part of the scope for this bug. I will follow up on it, though.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176509

There's no easy way to get WebRev to both incorporate cross-repo files *and* show diffs for moved files.

So here's one that shows all files:
WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8176509-use-pandoc-for-build-readme/webrev.01

And here's one that shows the diff for the moved files:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8176509-use-pandoc-for-build-readme/webrev.03

/Magnus


Reply via email to