On 16/10/2017 7:31 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi David,

thanks for reviewing!


One observation in src/hotspot/cpu/zero/sharedRuntime_zero.cpp, these includes would seem to be impossible:

  38 #ifdef COMPILER1
  39 #include "c1/c1_Runtime1.hpp"
  40 #endif
  41 #ifdef COMPILER2
  42 #include "opto/runtime.hpp"
  43 #endif

no?

I have no idea. It is at least theoretically possible to have a platform with C1 and/or C2 support based on the Zero interpreter? I'm leaving that in for now as it was pre-existing and not related to Shark removal, ok?

Yep that's fine.

Thanks.

David


In src/hotspot/share/ci/ciEnv.cpp you can just delete the comment entirely as it's obviously C2:

if (is_c2_compile(comp_level)) { // C2

Ditto in src/hotspot/share/compiler/compileBroker.cpp

!     // C2
      make_thread(name_buffer, _c2_compile_queue, counters, _compilers[1], compiler_thread, CHECK);

Ok, right. For consistency, I also remove // C1 in ciEnv.cpp similarily obvious is_c1_compile() call :-)

New webrev:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/8171853/webrev.02/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erkennke/8171853/webrev.02/>

Roman

Reply via email to