On 2017-11-21 12:44, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
This seems fine to me.
Do you know what the story is with the copyright header?
No, I don't. It was introduced in JDK-8149776, which has just a brief
rationale:
"Allow the jimage native code to be more easily re-used in JVM
implementations which cannot accept code under the GPL." I do not know
what prompted this.
It seems reasonable to keep the more liberaly licensed version, though.
(Which happens to coincide with the JDK version).
/Magnus
Thanks,
David
On 21/11/2017 9:13 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I ran a duplicate name check on the source base. Then I discovered
that there is a jimage.hpp in both
src/hotspot/share/classfile/jimage.hpp and
src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/jimage.hpp. They are identical
(apart from copyright headers), and once again, we shouldn't have
both. David Holmes suggested removing the hotspot version, so this
I've done.
I intend to push this to jdk/hs.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191203
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8191203-remove-duplicated-jimage-hpp/webrev.01
/Magnus
